Just another WordPress.com site

Archive for June, 2012

Investing Ahead of a Fiscal 2013 Cliff; Plus Alerian Stops Issuing Shares

Impending fiscal cliff has financial planners reviewing their options

America’s so-called fiscal cliff is making it hard for investors to plan ahead.

The fiscal cliff is the paradox that Congress and the White House now face: If they pass measures to slice the country’s massive budget deficit — potentially raising taxes and cutting spending — the very austerity measures helping to reduce a government budget crisis could ultimately plunge us into another recession.

What’s an investor to do in a portfolio?

The fiscal cliff is prompting consternation among financial planners, some of whom warn their retirement-age clients to avoid the stock market. “The U.S. is where Greece was four years ago,” opines Dan White, a financial planner in Glen Mills, founder of Dan White & Associates L.L.C. “Retirees can’t afford to lose money in the market. It’s great [to invest] when you’re working. But you can’t when you’re withdrawing” money from retirement accounts. He advises older clients to stick with index annuities.

Long-dated Treasuries have risen so much in price that many investors are either selling out of them slowly or shunning them. Yields on Treasuries (which move down when prices go higher, and vice versa) are pitiably low — and likely to stay that way. That amounts to a tax on savers who place money in U.S. government bonds. With yields at a historic low around 1.4 percent, Treasuries aren’t even keeping up with inflation.

“I don’t own them,” said David Pottruck, former chief executive of the Charles Schwab discount brokerage, on the sidelines of the 2012 Milken-Penn GSE Education Business Plan Competition at the University of Pennsylvania’s Annenberg Center last week. Pottruck, a Penn graduate, is now cochairman of HighTower Advisors, which oversees about $30 billion in assets.

“At a 2 percent to 2.5 percent inflation rate annually, that means essentially if you leave your money in cash for the next few years, you lose 2.5 percent of that every year. And that’s a tough principle for people to understand. They’re worth 2.5 percent less each year by doing nothing,” says Chris Millard of JPMorgan’s Philadelphia office.

Adding to the uncertainty, the Federal Reserve surprised the market last week when it failed to implement a new round of quantitative easing despite signs that the world is slipping into another recession. Although the Fed cut its U.S. economic growth forecast and said unemployment will remain above 8 percent, our central bank chose only to extend its so-called Operation Twist program.

Operation Twist means the Fed sells short-term while buying long-term bonds in an effort to “twist” the yield curve. Under the program, the Fed has been buying longer-dated Treasury bonds and selling Treasury bills and notes maturing up to three years, but its inventory of securities in that short-term band is down to about a two-month supply.

Investors wary of the impact of Jan. 1’s looming fiscal cliff, when the Bush-era tax cuts are due to end, could put a portion of their wealth into precious metals to hedge against the market’s volatility — either in exchange traded funds or gold mining shares, which have lagged the bullion price.

The United States could see consumer purchasing power fall substantially, notes investment bank Fairfax in a letter to clients. “We expect the Fed to take further action before this event to avert yet another potential crisis,” writes Fairfax. It advises investors to allocate money to gold as “we see the potential for further QE in the United States, China and Europe as leading gold higher this year.”

What else is working now in portfolios? Strangely enough, sectors benefiting from the historically low prices in U.S. natural gas, Millard says. He points to utilities switching over from coal to natural gas. They should benefit from lower fuel costs over the long term.

Speaking of natural gas, JPMorgan has stopped issuing new shares in its popular $4.27 billion Alerian MLP (symbol: AMJ), the master limited partnership exchange traded note. The fund reached 129 million shares last week, the maximum number allowed. By no longer issuing shares, the Alerian MLP essentially changes into a closed-end fund — and could trade at a premium or discount to its net asset value.

There are other options for natural gas exchange-traded funds, such as the ALPS Alerian MLP (symbol: AMLP), with $3.7 billion in assets. However, its structure as a C-corporation opens it up to corporate-level taxes, according to Investment News’ Jason Kephart. Master limited partnerships don’t pay corporate taxes.

Says Abbot Downing’s Thomas Raymond Jr., of the Alerian MLP: “It’s unfortunate as the menu of legitimate MLP investment vehicles is limited to begin with. As an owner, I wouldn’t mind a scarcity element creating a premium to [net asset value]. That said, AMJ could just as easily trade at a significant discount. It creates execution risk.”

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/business/homepage/20120626_Impending__lsquo_fiscal_cliff__has_financial_planners_reviewing_their_options.html#ixzz1yv9RJtZz

 


FBI Has Tips For You To Fight Investment Hackers

Advice for investors from the FBI on how to avoid getting scammed…my latest for the Philadelphia Inquirer….
‘Your Money’

As if the drama in Greece weren’t tragic enough, here at home we’re facing “taxmageddon,” a fiscal cliff, and potentially, hackers breaking into our bank and brokerage accounts.Take a deep breath. The FBI is here to help — at least with the hackers.

The FBI’s Philadelphia field office offers tips for investors about how to avoid getting scammed — and who to call if you do.

We don’t think of G-men tackling securities and investment fraud, but in fact, they do most of the nitty-gritty investigating for the regulators such as the Securities and Exchange Commission.

For instance, the FBI set up key wiretaps on hedge-fund big Raj Rajaratnam and crony Rajat Gupta — helping indict and convict them and about 60 others of insider trading.  The FBI used wiretaps as a legal first in a securities case, and established a working group with other Wall Street hedge funds to ferret out bad apples.

But regular folks also get scammed — not just one-percenters who invest in hedge funds. And the FBI and local authorities gave out their phone numbers and websites to help people like us. One good one is IC3 (www.ic3.gov) which was established as a partnership between the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center (NW3C) to receive Internet-related criminal complaints and refer the criminal complaints to federal, state or local law enforcement.

Richard Goldberg, chief of the economic crimes unit for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, told a packed room full of local bankers, fraud officers, and corporate reps for local businesses last week at FBI headquarters that one recent scam cropping up among bankers involves false tax refund cases.

“The Internal Revenue Service is under mandate to get returns and refunds done faster,” Goldberg said. So criminals are quickly setting up operations to file bogus returns based on stolen Social Security numbers — to the tune of billions of dollars.

Goldberg’s office handled the investment fraud case involving Philadelphia’s Life’s Good Inc. whose head, Robert Stinson Jr., was recently sentenced to 33 years in prison. Stinson operated a Ponzi scheme involving short-term real estate loans that pledged investors a 16 percent annual return — way too good to be true.

For those who suspect they may be getting scammed, especially locally, Goldberg gave out his office phone number for investors: 215-861-8439. “If you come across something that doesn’t seem right, call us,” he said. “We’d like to hear from you.”

Social media networks are also prime hunting grounds for “spear phishing,” in which hackers try to grab your passwords — especially those to your bank accounts, brokerage accounts and other investment assets.

If you log in to your bank or brokerage account on a mobile phone, you are most vulnerable, said Russell Handorf of the FBI’s Philadelphia field office.

“If you have programs like Skype on your phone — whether an Android or an iPhone — you’ve allowed that software to tag your location, take pictures of you and whomever you are talking to, and read your calendar, all of which can then be sent to other people,” Handorf said.

Ask yourself if you really need the latest application on your phone, and install anti-malware software for Android, BlackBerry or iPhone. While not foolproof, it’s a first line of defense.

Investors can take startlingly easy precautions with usernames and passwords. Do you use the same key for your house, your car and your bike lock? Of course not. Then do the same for your online persona, Handorf added.

Here are some things to keep in mind:

• Instead of “ABC123” as your username for all your financial accounts, use “ABC123BROKERAGE” for your investments, “ABC123CHECKING” for your checking account, and “ABC123MORTGAGE” for your home payment. Same thing for passwords.

• The FBI’s Michael Ruibal said one hacker gained access to a victim’s bank account by way of the person’s gym membership. The hacker called the local gym, saying “I’m so-and-so, and I forgot my password.” Armed with that password, the scammer then cracked the victim’s bank account. “By creating similar yet slightly different usernames and passwords when you access your bank or your broker on your smartphone, you minimize the ability of someone to figure out how to hack into your phone,” Ruibal said.

• Create unique challenge questions, such as “What is your grandmother’s maiden name?” Your mother’s maiden name is probably on Facebook or Ancestry.com and a thief doesn’t even need to be a hacker to figure that out.

• Set up a Google alert for your own name — you’ll be notified if any pertinent information such as birthday, Social Security number or address shows up on the Internet.

• Establish spending limits on money-market bank cards, and create text or e-mail notifications if big amounts start flooding out.

Erin Arvedlund is a finance reporter in Philadelphia. Contact her at 646-797-0759 or erinarvedlund@yahoo.com. Read more of her columns at http://www.philly.com/arvedlund

Read more: http://www.philly.com/philly/business/20120619_Advice_for_investors_from_the_FBI_on_how_to_avoid_getting_scammed.html#ixzz1yFL09NxP


Oft-Criticized Fed Model Says Stock Market Cheap; Investors Don’t Buy It

Stocks may offer upside vs bonds, but they’re still scary

Erin E. ArvedlundIn theory, U.S. equities offer more return than U.S. government bonds. But, wow, does it feel scary investing in the stock market these days.

The companies making up the Standard & Poor’s 500 index are throwing off an earnings yield that is quite high relative to the return on bonds; by this measure, stocks are inexpensive compared with fixed income.

Professional investors sometimes compare these two ratios — the earnings yield of the stock market and the yield on the 10-year Treasury bond — to determine which is undervalued or overvalued.

It’s called the Fed model, and I like this explanation from Investopedia:

Money managers compare the earnings yield of a broad market index such as the S&P 500 to prevailing interest rates, such as the current 10-year Treasury yield. If the earnings yield is less than the rate of the 10-year Treasury yield, stocks as a whole may be considered overvalued. If higher, stocks may considered undervalued relative to bonds.

Right now, the Fed model says stocks are a bargain: Companies in the S&P 500 are collectively earning about 7 percent, an advantage over government bonds owing to the Federal Reserve’s policy of low interest rates. The 10-year U.S. Treasury is yielding a historically low 1.4 percent, and the Fed has promised to keep rates low (some say dangerously) until 2014.

But the volatility of the stock market is downright frightening, and the Fed is manipulating interest rates to make other assets more attractive.

So are stocks really cheaper, or does it just seem that way?

We checked in with a longtime pro, Ernest Cecilia, the new chief investment officer at Bryn Mawr Trust Co., who came over from recently purchased Davidson Trust, of Devon. He agreed that the stock market is cheap on this one basis, but added that he focuses on individual stocks instead.

The bank likes Unilever for client accounts. The giant household and consumer-products company generates half its business from emerging markets.

“There’s a stratification of income in the middle class going on in emerging markets. This is the kind of company that will grow there,” Cecilia said, and yields 4.1 percent in dividends and 7 percent earnings growth in the meantime.

Davidson Trust is Bryn Mawr Trust’s third recent acquisition in the trusts and money-management arena. In 2008, Bryn Mawr acquired Lau Associates, a financial-planning firm based in Wilmington, after buying the private-wealth-management group of Hershey Trust Co.

Bryn Mawr Trust, which now oversees $6 billion, is in the process of reviewing its investments, including mutual-fund families, he added. Among some Bryn Mawr Trust is jettisoning is Nuveen Tradewinds Emerging Markets Fund, which has had horrible returns. Bryn Mawr is adding some Lazard mutual funds.

In the U.S. government-bond market, Cecilia said, his company has been a seller of Treasuries since last summer. “We felt there wasn’t much value. We have been disinvesting, and moved that money into high-grade corporate bonds.”

That said, Bryn Mawr still holds some client account money in shorter-term Treasuries and Vanguard short- and intermediate-term corporate tax-exempt mutual funds.

But back to the ratio. Other investment pros, such as Barry Ritholtz, of Fusion IQ, have debunked the Fed model, arguing that the inputs into the two ratios are flawed. Analysts tend to overstate their earnings estimates for S&P 500 companies, and that skews the ratio.

“The Fed model assumes analysts’ consensus is accurate. That assumption has been the undoing of many an investor,” Ritholtz wrote in his blog, the Big Picture (www.ritholtz.com).

Anticipating the possibility of a recession, he has been adding Wal-Mart to his client accounts. Since it topped out in January 2000, Ritholtz wrote, “Wal-Mart’s stock has gone nowhere — until now. It has finally broken out to levels not seen in a decade.”

 

Read more columns at: http://www.philly.com/philly/business/personal_finance/20120612_Erin_Arvedlund__Stocks_are_offering_more__but_they_re_still_scary.html#ixzz1xaq0sP6N


Special Needs Kids Need Trust Accounts, Not Money In Their Name

Don’t put money in your special-needs child’s name…Put it in a trust account

The worst thing you can do is put money aside for your special needs child–it could endanger their government assistance and benefits…

Special-needs planning

Financial advisers specializing in planning for special-needs kids say it’s more important than ever to make sure there is a trust set up in the child’s name — and that the children not receive money directly.

Planners with Firstrust Financial Resources, a wealth management firm that represents MetLife (symbol: MET) point out that in Pennsylvania, special-needs children can’t hold assets in their own name — otherwise their government subsidies could stop. In such cases, it’s common that they and their families have to reapply for Medicaid and Social Security once the assets in the child’s name run out.

With government subsidies under fire, it is important to make sure your special-needs child doesn’t miss out because of financial assets held in their name.

Another common mistake: Parents of special-needs kids leave money to other children and ask them to take care of their brother or sister, but have never discussed the responsibility. If you leave all your money to your non-special needs child, who then gets divorced, half of those assets could go to their ex-spouse.

Planning strategies aren’t just for the wealthy. They can be used to protect your family.

With the current volatility in both stock and bond markets, most money managers aren’t as worried about taking risks in a portfolio as they are about preserving your capital and protecting income from dividend-oriented or growth stocks and bonds.

Still, they are all having a hard time reading what has been an unusual investing climate.

Such is the case with local money manager Bob Costello, who manages $55 million at his own shop, Costello Asset Management in Huntingdon Valley. A La Salle graduate, he started out at W.H. Newbold’s Son & Co., then went on to Boenning & Scattergood Inc. before setting up his own advisory firm.

“I try to buy businesses that have recurring revenue and are not as dependent on business cycles. That’s why I like Visa Inc.,” he said.

Trading under the ticker symbol “V,” Visa has a market capitalization of more than $77 billion compared with $18 billion when it went public in 2008. “We are living in a cashless society. While it’s not a cheap stock, it’s growing. Can they grow to a $200 billion stock? I think so.”

And despite the historic low prices in natural gas, he also likes Piedmont Natural Gas Co. Inc. (symbol: PNY) and UGI Corp. (UGI), a diversified energy company in Valley Forge.

In March, UGI said it would develop the Commonwealth Pipeline, a 200-mile, 30-inch pipeline transporting Marcellus Shale gas from northeastern Pennsylvania to major markets in the Mid-Atlantic states. And UGI recently declared a 4 percent increase in its stock dividend, maintaining a 25-year trend of increasing the dividend. “The natural gas industry is dirt cheap,” he added.

Finally, Costello also owns the French energy giant Total S.A., a stock he predicts he could hit $60 for its American depositary receipts (TOT), which closed at $42.50 Monday. “Their dividend yield is 7 percent and it is selling at six times earnings,” a level cheaper than its peers, he said.

Portfolio managers all over are harking back to other times when the markets were this volatile — and remark that everyone appears to be hiding in the same investment plays (dividend stocks, corporate and municipal bonds, precious metals).

“I’ve been in finance since 1973 at the Federal Reserve Bank in New York,” recalled Ray Stone, cofounder of Stone & McCarthy Research Associates in Princeton, whose firm supplies much of the economic data and analysis to Wall Street. “What is so different? We had a series of bubbles over time. The equity bubble in the late 1990s, then a second bubble for housing that affected more people. Few of us have large stock portfolios, but many of us own homes. We’re underwater, and that has made the financial fallout particularly difficult.”

He added: “Financial crises are often longer than recessions. We are on the right track out of the recession, however.”

U.S. economic growth remains a tepid but steady 2.5 percent annually. Still, the recovery doesn’t feel as good because the unemployment rate has reached what seems like a permanently higher level at 8.2 percent as of last Friday’s jobs numbers. Inflation shouldn’t be a problem, according to Stone. “We still have loads of slack in the economy, and that should contain inflation.”

The only time Stone recalls this type of market volatility was a period in the early 1980s “when the Fed was targeting money supply and short-term swings in the bond market were more acute. But today, we have more crosscurrents like the federal deficit in the U.S. And now credit-related news [such as Greece’s possible default] has a huge impact.”

Nonetheless, the Treasury market in the U.S. remains a haven, as last week’s record low yield on 10-year bonds showed. But it can’t last forever. The question is, just how long will it last?